/
sipaHow to linearize your cluster
Posted by sipa
Feb 11, 2025/00:34 UTC
The comparison between Guided Graph Traversal (GGT) or Dynamic Slicing (DS) and Parallel Breadth-First Search (PBFS) highlights a key advantage in how they handle chunk splittings during computations. GGT or DS boasts an optimal approach to improving diagrams through the subdivision of chunks. This method ensures that each min-cut, or division of a chunk into two, represents the best possible improvement under the constraint of only subdividing single chunks. In contrast, PBFS sequentially finds breakpoints, which may not yield the most efficient or fair distribution of computational effort.
Furthermore, the implementation strategy for handling time or work thresholds greatly influences the fairness and efficiency of partial solutions generated by these algorithms. GGT's approach, which entails aborting the computation once a specified limit is exceeded, tends to produce a more balanced partial solution. This is because it avoids overcommitting resources to early chunks at the expense of later ones, a pitfall common in PBFS implementations. PBFS might dedicate all available time to processing the first chunk, neglecting subsequent chunks, thereby resulting in a less equitable outcome. This distinction underscores the superiority of GGT or DS in achieving fairer and potentially more effective partitioning of computational tasks when faced with constraints.
TLDR
Join Our Newsletter
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
Explore all Products
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback