/
sipaPosted by sipa
Feb 10, 2025/18:39 UTC
The discussion revolves around the performance expectations of an algorithm, specifically addressing the assumption regarding its runtime with a focus on a scenario involving 500 nodes. The initial expectation posited is for these nodes to execute in less than 50 microseconds under a cubic runtime assumption. However, this expectation is quickly challenged by observations from a paper, which presents benchmark results that significantly deviate from the anticipated complexity bounds.
Further investigation into the performance characteristics of the algorithm involved running a regression analysis on the dataset provided within the paper. This analysis yielded a more nuanced understanding of the algorithm's runtime, revealing it to be governed by a formula where time, (t), is approximately equal to (0.00098 \times n^{0.091} \times m^{0.77}). This formula indicates a relationship between runtime and the variables (n) and (m), suggesting a far less straightforward complexity than initially assumed. This nuanced understanding underscores the importance of empirical analysis in validating theoretical performance expectations of algorithms.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback