/
sipaPosted by sipa
Feb 10, 2025/18:39 UTC
The discussion revolves around the performance expectations of an algorithm, specifically addressing the assumption regarding its runtime with a focus on a scenario involving 500 nodes. The initial expectation posited is for these nodes to execute in less than 50 microseconds under a cubic runtime assumption. However, this expectation is quickly challenged by observations from a paper, which presents benchmark results that significantly deviate from the anticipated complexity bounds.
Further investigation into the performance characteristics of the algorithm involved running a regression analysis on the dataset provided within the paper. This analysis yielded a more nuanced understanding of the algorithm's runtime, revealing it to be governed by a formula where time, (t), is approximately equal to (0.00098 \times n^{0.091} \times m^{0.77}). This formula indicates a relationship between runtime and the variables (n) and (m), suggesting a far less straightforward complexity than initially assumed. This nuanced understanding underscores the importance of empirical analysis in validating theoretical performance expectations of algorithms.
Thread Summary (78 replies)
Dec 20 - May 18, 2025
79 messages
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback