On the scalability issues of onboarding millions of LN mobile clients

Posted by Antoine Riard

May 17, 2020/03:37 UTC

The discussion revolves around the potential economic weight of nodes in evaluating miner consensus-hijack success and the hope that Lightning will replace centralized custodial services. The scalability advantage of Lightning lies in its ability to transfer to any Lightning client without touching the blockchain, for much reduced transfer fees while retaining noncustodiality. In a Lightning future with massive SPV, it may end up with more economic weight in SPV nodes than in the world without Lightning and dependent on centralized custodial services to scale. To strengthen SPV, backup nodes must be picked up manually at client initialization, before any risk of conflict to avoid Reddit-style hijack during contentious periods or other massive social engineering. Publicly-facing backup servers should be incentivized to exist, and privately-owned servers could work if everyone runs them. A combination of UX, user education, and fallback security mechanisms can help avoid economy hijack.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback