Changes to BIP-360 - Pay to Quantum Resistant Hash (P2QRH)

Posted by murch

Jul 16, 2025/17:53 UTC

The discussion centers on the selection of protocol versions for blockchain transactions, specifically highlighting concerns over payload size and efficiency. The primary point raised is the necessity of choosing a protocol version that aligns with the payload size requirements of a 256-bit hash without the need for additional, unnecessary bytes. This consideration is crucial for optimizing space on the blockchain, which has permanent implications.

There appears to be some confusion regarding the versions of the protocols in question. Contrary to what might have been previously understood, P2TR operates under version 1. The conversation then shifts towards deciding between version 2 or version 3 for future use. The choice is pivotal, given that Ethan, a participant in the discussion, has already ruled out the adoption of the same version as P2TR for their purposes. This decision-making process underscores the importance of selecting the most suitable protocol version based on specific technical requirements such as payload size, rather than merely defaulting to the use of an existing version without considering its compatibility or efficiency.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback