Non interactive anti-exfil (airgap compatible)

The inquiry revolves around the feasibility of estimating the number of signatures required to compromise a 128 or 256-bit seed, specifically when Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes are applied, which are considered nearly flawless from an information-theoretical standpoint. The discussion hinges on the premise that if one can perform (2^b) grinding steps for each signature, it becomes possible to leak (b) bits per signature. Consequently, to fully leak a 128-bit seed, one would need (128 / b) signatures. This mathematical relationship underlines the direct proportionality between the number of signatures and the ability to leak bits of the seed, emphasizing the potential vulnerability and the computational effort required to exploit such cryptographic systems.