The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core

The discourse on the privatization of Bitcoin Core development stems from a critical examination of open-source software development practices, especially in light of recent disruptions and inefficiencies observed on GitHub. The recurring issue at hand involves the intrusion of non-contributors into forums designed for collaborative development work on Bitcoin Core, leading to time wastage, controversy, misinformation, and other problems. This phenomenon underscores the challenges posed by open forums in managing contributions and feedback effectively. It is highlighted that while open-source development allows developers the freedom to collaborate on projects of their choosing, it also exposes them to unnecessary distractions and detracts from the core objectives of development work.

An opportunity is presented to reimagine the collaboration model within the Bitcoin Core project, suggesting a shift towards a privatized, members-only platform for software development. Such a system would feature private issues and pull requests to minimize public interference and ensure focused development efforts. The proposed model emphasizes the continuation of development under existing licenses, with new contributions possibly being subject to specific licensing agreements. This approach aims to balance open-source principles with the need for efficient and targeted development processes.

Furthermore, the discussion extends to the current dynamics of open-source development and the impact of external pressures on developer autonomy. The critique of GitHub's moderation capabilities underscores the need for better control mechanisms to protect the integrity of development spaces from disruptive behaviors. The argument for privatization is rooted in the desire to create a more conducive environment for productive collaboration, free from the coercive influences of non-contributing entities. By establishing a private workspace, developers would be able to manage contributions and discussions more effectively, potentially increasing the project's resilience against external adversarial forces.

The email also touches on broader philosophical and practical considerations regarding the nature of open-source development, community engagement, and the preservation of developer autonomy. The proposed shift towards a privatized model is framed as a strategic response to the unique challenges facing the Bitcoin Core project, aiming to safeguard its future success while maintaining the spirit of open collaboration.

Included references offer additional perspectives on the topic:

• Well-Kept Gardens Die by Pacifism
• Geeks, Mops, Sociopaths
• Bitcoin Core Meta Issue #19
• Kanzure's Tweet on X.com