delvingbitcoin

Combined summary - OP_PAIRCOMMIT as a candidate for addition to LNhance

Combined summary - OP_PAIRCOMMIT as a candidate for addition to LNhance

The current discussion on the OP_PAIRCOMMIT specification, destined for a PR against BINANA, is accessible through a shared gist.

The emphasis is on maintaining constructive dialogue and avoiding the deletion of threads unless they are non-contributory. Open discussions and presentations, rather than comprehensive document updates, are encouraged for sharing developments. A request was made to @ajtowns to delete or archive a confusing topic in favor of a more clear presentation regarding the PAIRCOMMIT thread, acknowledging an update to the spec that moves away from its draft status.

In the realm of Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), a potential optimization involves eliminating the DUP VERIFY step through a CheckTemplateVerify (CTV) error when encountering a 0-byte hash argument. This proposal reflects a consensus against unnecessary complexity in CTV operations. A resolution to a specific PC code issue has been achieved, as detailed in a GitHub pull request, showcasing the collaborative and iterative nature of Bitcoin development. Additionally, the complexity encountered in serializing valtype to HashWriter highlights the intricate considerations developers navigate to enhance Bitcoin's technology.

The discussion also explores SHA256 iteration optimization for LN-Symmetry, suggesting a method minimizing hashing while accommodating preimage sizes that prevent length redistribution attacks and support future CTV upgrades. An inquiry into hashing methodologies underscores a desire for efficient and secure practices, emphasizing the balance between innovation and established protocols within project development dynamics. Furthermore, the concept of adopting a mini-hashing technique for byte distribution in stack elements proposes a shift from static padding, aiming for more adaptable data manipulation methods.

Bitcoin script optimizations include comparisons between employing OP_CAT for OP_PAIRCOMMIT emulation and other redundancies aimed at efficiency improvements. The debate extends to new opcode proposals like OP_CAT and their implications on project simplicity and advancement, with a preference for prioritizing foundational opcodes such as OP_CTV before integrating more complex functionalities. Vector Commitments using OP_PAIRCOMMIT are advocated for enhancing security and simplifying contract scripting by guarding against witness malleability and streamlining script interactions.

Lastly, the optimization of SHA256 iterations for LN-Symmetry involves pre-computing the Tag as a mid-state, facilitating efficient validation processes. This includes handling scenarios with specific byte commitments and addressing potential length redistribution attacks through innovative hashing techniques. A custom hash function example demonstrates an approach to altering output significantly with minor input changes, offering a solution to enhance security and efficiency in LN-Symmetry applications with CTV. For technical details and proposed code adjustments, reference is made to a GitHub pull request, which further elucidates on the subject.

Discussion History

0
moonsettler Original Post
October 25, 2024 14:34 UTC
1
October 25, 2024 14:38 UTC
2
October 25, 2024 17:57 UTC
3
October 25, 2024 19:06 UTC
4
October 25, 2024 19:11 UTC
5
October 25, 2024 19:22 UTC
6
October 25, 2024 21:50 UTC
7
October 28, 2024 11:16 UTC
8
October 28, 2024 12:05 UTC
9
October 29, 2024 09:38 UTC
10
October 29, 2024 10:52 UTC
11
October 29, 2024 11:36 UTC