Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Motion to Activate BIP 3

29 replies

By Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch

Involving Murch, Greg Maxwell+17 others

calendar icon

Original post on November 5, 2025 01:10 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 2, 2025 00:29 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • BIP 3 was proposed in March 2025 after completion of prior work.

  • Significant support and discussion for BIP 3 activation is evident online.

  • Modifications to BIP 3 include SPDX License Expressions and clarified proposal processes.

A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain

12 replies

By A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Lazy Fair

Involving waxwing/ AdamISZ, Erik Aronesty+5 others

calendar icon

Original post on November 20, 2025 01:57 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 2, 2025 12:33 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The email proposes solutions for removing objectionable content from the Bitcoin blockchain.

  • It suggests consensus and client-level changes allowing node operators to filter content post-mining.

  • The approach involves sophisticated hashing to maintain data integrity even when parts are deleted.

[BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352

2 replies

By [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Craig Raw

Involving Craig Raw, Oghenovo Usiwoma

calendar icon

Original post on December 4, 2025 06:45 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 4, 2025 11:02 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The proposal enhances Bitcoin wallet interoperability and recovery through silent payments.

  • It introduces `sp()`, `spscan1q`, and `spspend1q` for efficient transaction processes.

  • Optional block height and arguments in `sp()` aim to optimize scanning workloads.

Great Consensus Cleanup Revival

87 replies

By AntoineP

Involving ajtowns, sjors+14 others

calendar icon

Original post on March 24, 2024 19:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 4, 2025 14:33 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The analysis highlights vulnerabilities in Bitcoin, suggesting improvements for network security and performance.

  • Proposed solutions include adjusting mining retarget periods and imposing constraints on old transaction formats.

  • The proposal sparks debate on block size limits, emphasizing a cautious approach towards changes affecting scalability.

Stats on compact block reconstructions

49 replies

By 0xB10C

Involving ajtowns, davidgumberg+11 others

calendar icon

Original post on August 2, 2024 12:08 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 2, 2025 11:51 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The study analyzes compact block reconstructions in Bitcoin, highlighting the role of transaction awareness.

  • Node configuration adjustments, like `mempoolfullrbf=1`, significantly impact block reconstruction efficiency.

  • Periods of high mempool activity correlate with decreased compact block reconstruction rates, suggesting network congestion effects.

Gossip Observer: New project to monitor the Lightning P2P network

13 replies

By jonhbit

Involving rustyrussell, gmaxwell

calendar icon

Original post on November 14, 2025 20:48 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 4, 2025 04:38 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The project monitors Lightning Network's gossip, showing faster message spread and connectivity issues.

  • Observations include a major share of messages from few nodes and bandwidth underestimations.

  • Future plans involve expanding infrastructure and welcoming community engagement for analysis.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback