Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Addressing remaining points on BIP 54

11 replies

By Antoine Poinsot

Involving Antoine Riard, Matt Corallo+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 15:59 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 14, 2026 18:58 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Luke Dashjr criticizes BIP 54 for compromising ASIC optimization by embedding extranonce in nLockTime.

  • Jeremy Rubin suggests a sparse Merkle tree to avoid smart contract issues, facing skepticism for protocol changes.

  • The debate shows a preference for pragmatic solutions over major protocol alterations in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

SImple quantum security, at the expense of slower tx time

By Erik Aronesty

calendar icon

Original post on January 28, 2026 18:36 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 28, 2026 18:36 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • A novel quantum-secure vault scheme utilizes covenant-protected vaults and timelocks for security.

  • The scheme separates execution triggers from value destinations, with a multi-phase locking and revealing process.

  • It features quantum signature safety, reorg resistance, and an escape hatch preventing unauthorized value transfer.

Disposing of "dust attack" UTXOs

12 replies

By bubb1es

Involving andrewtoth, sipa+4 others

calendar icon

Original post on January 25, 2026 17:20 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 2, 2026 20:49 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Dust attacks in wallets involve small crypto amounts to unveil address connections.

  • A solution proposes spending dust on fees, making it easy with lower fee rates.

  • Challenges include user fingerprinting and potential confusion for multisig device users.

Major BIP 360 Update

10 replies

By cryptoquick

Involving ajtowns, josh+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 19, 2025 20:46 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 1, 2026 03:09 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Ethan Heilman and colleagues rewrote BIP 360 for clarity and quantum risk mitigation.

  • BIP 360 now includes "Pay-to-Tapscript-Hash" to protect against quantum vulnerabilities.

  • The revision offers test vectors in Python and Rust, inviting community review for Bitcoin's security.

BLISK: Boolean circuit Logic Integrated into the Single Key

8 replies

By olkurbatov

Involving ZmnSCPxj, evd0kim+1 other

calendar icon

Original post on January 26, 2026 23:23 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 3, 2026 23:51 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • A novel Bitcoin initiative enhances authorization by encoding complex boolean logic into transaction validation.

  • The approach combines AND/OR logic and Schnorr signatures to maintain privacy and efficiency.

  • This advancement allows for nuanced policy enforcement without external visibility, inviting community feedback for further development.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback