Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Addressing remaining points on BIP 54

12 replies

By Antoine Poinsot

Involving Antoine Riard, Matt Corallo+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 15:59 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 30, 2026 04:08 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • BIP 54 debate resurfaces, focusing on coinbase transaction modifications and ASIC optimization concerns.

  • Jeremy Rubin proposes a new sparse Merkle tree, avoiding 64-byte transaction size restrictions.

  • Consensus favors pragmatic solutions, balancing innovation with stability, avoiding drastic protocol changes.

BIP-352: Limiting the number of per-group recipients (K_max)

By Sebastian Falbesoner

calendar icon

Original post on February 4, 2026 17:20 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 4, 2026 17:20 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • BIP-352's scanning method in Silent Payments shows significant performance issues with adversarial transactions.

  • A new proposal suggests a "K_max" protocol limit to improve efficiency without affecting current SP wallets.

  • Broad community engagement is sought via GitHub and mailing lists to refine the proposed protocol enhancement.

OP_CC: A simple introspection opcode to enable cheaper consolidations

15 replies

By billymcbip

Involving reardencode, sipa+6 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 12:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 7, 2026 13:48 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The new Tapscript opcode, **OP_CHECKCONSOLIDATION (OP_CC)**, enhances Bitcoin consolidation efficiency.

  • **OP_CC** allows bypassing individual signatures for subsequent inputs from the same scriptPubKey (SPK).

  • This method significantly reduces blockchain space and data by making transactions more space-efficient.

Major BIP 360 Update

14 replies

By cryptoquick

Involving sipa, ajtowns+4 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 19, 2025 20:46 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 6, 2026 22:21 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Ethan Heilman and colleagues have rewritten BIP 360 for clarity and quantum risk mitigation.

  • The revision introduces "Pay-to-Tapscript-Hash" to strengthen Bitcoin's quantum resistance.

  • It adds test vectors and encourages community feedback for Bitcoin's security enhancement.

Disposing of "dust attack" UTXOs

14 replies

By bubb1es

Involving andrewtoth, sipa+5 others

calendar icon

Original post on January 25, 2026 17:20 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on February 7, 2026 17:31 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Dust attacks on on-chain wallets pose significant risks by linking UTXOs to reveal user connections.

  • Proposed solutions include spending dust UTXOs on fees with specific transactions, feasible with lowered fee rates.

  • Implementation challenges include potential user fingerprinting, rebroadcasting issues, and multisig device complications.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback