Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future

15 replies

By Mikhail Kudinov

Involving Jonas Nick, conduition+5 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 8, 2025 20:28 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 24, 2025 15:02 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Hash-based cryptographic solutions for Bitcoin focus on SHA-256's security and are post-quantum safe.

  • Optimizations allow for smaller hash-based signatures, enhancing practicality for Bitcoin's blockchain.

  • The community is encouraged to discuss integrating stateful or stateless schemes for future quantum resistance.

Addressing remaining points on BIP 54

8 replies

By Antoine Poinsot

Involving Antoine Riard, Matt Corallo+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 15:59 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 14, 2026 00:23 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Luke Dashjr critiques BIP 54 for potentially missing an ASIC optimization by using nLockTime.

  • Jeremy Rubin proposes a sparse Merkle tree over restricting 64-byte transactions for smart contracts.

  • The consensus prioritizes avoiding major protocol changes while ensuring system stability and mitigating risks.

Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3

6 replies

By Murch

Involving Bryan Bishop, Chris Stewart+4 others

calendar icon

Original post on January 7, 2026 00:42 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 14, 2026 00:47 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • BIP 3 adoption discussion showed widespread community support, facing minor concerns leading to its modification.

  • Key community figures and additional supporters endorsed the amended BIP 3 proposal, underscoring its acceptance.

  • The need for broader community review on BIP 3's consensus highlights the collaborative decision-making in Bitcoin's development.

BIP352: PSBT support

29 replies

By josibake

Involving andrewtoth, achow101+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on May 17, 2024 11:51 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 16, 2026 13:40 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Current PSBT capabilities and future enhancements focus on privacy and security in cryptocurrency transactions.

  • A draft BIP proposes an `OutputGenerator` role for easier integration of silent payments into existing systems.

  • Technical and security complexities challenge full support of silent payments, but collaborative efforts show progress.

OP_CC: A simple introspection opcode to enable cheaper consolidations

14 replies

By billymcbip

Involving reardencode, sipa+5 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 12:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 19, 2026 16:06 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The new Tapscript opcode, OP_CHECKCONSOLIDATION, enhances Bitcoin transaction efficiency.

  • It reduces the witness size needed by allowing subsequent inputs from the same SPK to bypass individual signatures.

  • This method streamlines UTXO consolidation, promising a leaner blockchain and scalability improvements.

Stealth addresses using nostr

11 replies

By 1440000bytes

Involving setavenger, AdamISZ

calendar icon

Original post on July 9, 2025 17:13 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 17, 2026 05:54 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Nostr uses cryptographic techniques like Bitcoin, enabling new key generation and Bitcoin payments.

  • It improves BIP 47 by introducing encrypted notification for stealth payments via NIP-17.

  • The Python code demonstrates stealth key creation, enhancing privacy in Bitcoin transactions.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback