Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Addressing remaining points on BIP 54

11 replies

By Antoine Poinsot

Involving Antoine Riard, Matt Corallo+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 15:59 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 14, 2026 18:58 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • BIP 54's discussion resurfaces, with debates on its implications and suggested changes.

  • Critics argue nLockTime usage may compromise ASIC optimization, while proponents see it as elegant.

  • Jeremy Rubin suggests a new Merkle tree to avoid restricting transaction size, spurring further debate.

Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal

10 replies

By Giulio Golinelli

Involving conduition, waxwing/ AdamISZ+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on January 22, 2026 07:01 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 27, 2026 16:07 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • A technical demo has integrated the Falcon post-quantum signature into Bitcoin Core as a soft fork.

  • Falcon's efficiency and smaller key sizes outperform current Bitcoin cryptography, ECDSA, in benchmarks.

  • The aim is to transition Bitcoin towards post-quantum security with Falcon, enhancing transaction efficiency.

libsecp256k1 0.7.1 released

By Pieter Wuille

calendar icon

Original post on January 26, 2026 21:15 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 26, 2026 21:15 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Version 0.7.1 of libsecp256k1 has been released, enhancing functionality and security.

  • Improvements include a security enhancement, a new testing framework, and build system updates.

  • A comprehensive changelog is available for details on the updates and improvements.

Benchmarking Bitcoin Script Evaluation for the Varops Budget (Great Script Restoration)

15 replies

By Julian

Involving ajtowns, instagibbs+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on November 7, 2025 15:14 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 26, 2026 05:31 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • A new Tapscript leaf version introduces a varops budget to mitigate denial-of-service attacks in Bitcoin.

  • The varops budget links to transaction weight, with benchmarking essential for evaluating its efficiency.

  • Community involvement is encouraged for refining the budget through benchmark tests and GitHub contributions.

SHRINCS: 324-byte stateful post-quantum signatures with static backups

13 replies

By jonasnick

Involving conduition, moonsettler

calendar icon

Original post on December 11, 2025 08:40 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 27, 2026 06:38 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • SHRINCS combines efficient stateful and robust stateless hash-based signatures for limited signature needs.

  • It uses an unbalanced XMSS tree and SPHINCS+ variant, ensuring efficient operations and a secure fallback.

  • The scheme optimizes for applications like Bitcoin wallets and includes a seamless transition to stateless signatures for reliability.

Disposing of "dust attack" UTXOs

8 replies

By bubb1es

Involving 0xB10C, AdamISZ+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on January 25, 2026 17:20 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 30, 2026 19:17 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Dust attacks in on-chain wallets attempt to reveal user connections through small transactions.

  • Solutions include locking dust UTXOs or spending them on fees to prevent risks.

  • Implementing disposal features poses challenges like user fingerprinting and multisig difficulties.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback