Active Discussions

Check out posts actively getting replies and inspiring conversations.

Motion to Activate BIP 3

10 replies

By Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch

Involving David A. Harding, Greg Maxwell+9 others

calendar icon

Original post on November 5, 2025 01:10 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 18, 2025 15:47 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • BIP 3 was proposed in March 2025, with several enhancements since its advancement.

  • Active GitHub pull request #1820 aims to activate BIP 3, drawing extensive community discussion.

  • Proposed changes to BIP 3 include adopting SPDX License Expressions and refining the BIP process.

OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea

4 replies

By OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea Erik Aronesty

Involving Erik Aronesty, Eric Voskuil+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on September 30, 2025 00:09 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on October 3, 2025 22:15 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • A new opcode, `OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH`, could boost Bitcoin's efficiency and security.

  • It introduces a soft fork allowing miners to embed a UTXO set hash optionally.

  • This system reduces node resource demands, maintaining blockchain integrity and usability.

Improve Bitcoin’s resilience to large-scale power grid failures and Carrington-type solar storms

By Improve Bitcoin’s resilience to large-scale power grid failures and Carrington-type solar storms Alexandre

Involving Edil Guimarães de Medeiros

calendar icon

Original post on November 16, 2025 22:54 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 16, 2025 22:54 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The feature request aims to make Bitcoin resilient against disruptions from major solar events.

  • Proposed improvements include support for degraded communication and detailed operator guidance.

  • The goal is to ensure Bitcoin's robustness in facing severe solar phenomena.

Stats on compact block reconstructions

45 replies

By 0xB10C

Involving ajtowns, davidgumberg+10 others

calendar icon

Original post on August 2, 2024 12:08 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 19, 2025 08:14 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The study analyzes compact block reconstructions in the Bitcoin network, focusing on transaction awareness.

  • Node configuration adjustments affected block reconstructions, with specific settings improving efficiency.

  • Investigation into block reconstruction times underscores the influence of network connectivity and transaction request necessity.

BIP352: PSBT support

28 replies

By josibake

Involving andrewtoth, achow101+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on May 17, 2024 11:51 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 13, 2025 20:42 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The discussion emphasizes enhancing cryptocurrency privacy through PSBTs, reviewing current methods and future innovations.

  • A draft BIP proposes an `OutputGenerator` role for streamlined silent payment integration, minimizing other roles' adjustments.

  • Despite potential for more private transactions, security risks remain with unproven methods like "ECDH share".

Taxonomy of Transaction Fees in Smart Contracts

17 replies

By instagibbs

Involving VzxPLnHqr, ajtowns+6 others

calendar icon

Original post on February 1, 2024 16:52 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on November 18, 2025 20:50 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The email explores mechanisms for handling fees in Bitcoin transactions and smart contract designs.

  • It differentiates between endogenous and exogenous fees and their applications in Bitcoin scaling solutions.

  • Various strategies like CPFP, package RBF, and composed transactions are discussed for fee management.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback