Posted by Andrew Poelstra
Oct 24, 2023/13:05 UTC
In the email, the sender expresses surprise at realizing that a particular looping technique does not negatively affect performance as they had previously thought. They mention that the loop involves adding at most 1000 numbers, which is unlikely to have a noticeable impact on performance. Although the sender acknowledges this fact, they still feel uneasy about refactoring the associated file. The email concludes with a quote and the sender's contact information.
It is interesting to note that the sender introduces the topic with a lighthearted tone, expressing amusement at their previous misconception. They then delve into the details of the looping technique and its potential impact on performance. However, they quickly dismiss any concerns by emphasizing that the task only involves adding a relatively small number of numbers.
Despite recognizing the negligible effect on performance, the sender admits to feeling apprehensive about refactoring the file in question. This suggests that there may be other factors at play, such as the complexity or criticality of the code. Unfortunately, the email does not provide further context or explanation for this sentiment.
Overall, the email provides insights into the sender's thought process and their surprise regarding the performance implications of a looping technique. While the email lacks specific technical details or concrete examples, it offers a glimpse into the sender's perspective and highlights the importance of considering performance optimizations in programming.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback