Posted by Ryan Grant
Oct 26, 2023/14:30 UTC
The email discusses the support for OP_CAT and reasonable resource-consumption limiters. The sender suggests implementing it as a UASF (User Activated Soft Fork) to build confidence in this method. Additionally, the sender expresses support for moving forward with other opcodes as long as they are known to be safe and maintainable. These opcodes could be used for purposes such as introspection, transaction unpinning, or vaults.
In terms of supporting OP_CAT, the sender believes that implementing it as a UASF would be beneficial. This approach involves users collectively activating a soft fork on the blockchain network. By doing so, it would help to establish trust and confidence in this particular method.
Furthermore, the sender expresses a broader support for the introduction of other opcodes, as long as they are proven to be safe and maintainable. These additional opcodes could serve various purposes, such as introspection, transaction unpinning, or vaults. Introspection allows for examining the internal state of smart contracts, while transaction unpinning refers to the process of removing unnecessary dependencies between transactions. Vaults, on the other hand, provide a secure storage solution for digital assets.
Overall, the email highlights the sender's support for OP_CAT and reasonable resource-consumption limiters, advocating for their implementation as a UASF. Additionally, the sender indicates a willingness to explore the introduction of other opcodes for different functionalities, provided they are known to be safe and maintainable.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback