Proposed BIP for OP_CAT

The email discusses an old limit that predates segwit and may even predate P2SH. The sender expresses a similar thought but believes that replacing the stack interpreter data structure would be too invasive to justify the benefit. The sender also mentions their appreciation for the BIP's (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) minimal difference.

From the content of the email, it is clear that the discussion revolves around the technical aspects of Bitcoin and the potential changes or improvements that could be made. The mention of segwit and P2SH suggests that these are relevant concepts being considered in the conversation. However, specific details about these concepts or their implications are not provided.

While the email does not explicitly state the sender's viewpoint on the matter, their hesitation towards replacing the stack interpreter data structure indicates a cautious approach. It seems they prioritize maintaining the current structure over potential benefits that might come with a replacement.

The email concludes with a signature from Andrew Poelstra, who is identified as the Director of Research at Blockstream. Contact information, including an email address and a website link, is provided as well. There is also a lighthearted quote about the sun always shining in space, possibly added for personal touch.

Overall, the email offers insights into the sender's thoughts on the discussed limit, emphasizing the importance of considering the potential impact of making changes to the existing stack interpreter data structure in Bitcoin.