Bounds on chain length with BIP-54 timewarp fixes

Posted by zawy

Sep 20, 2026/00:01 UTC

The email highlights a specific computational adjustment where the actual work, denoted as ( w' ), is derived from the initial value ( w ) using the ratio ( \frac{2016}{2014} ). This recalibrated value ( w' ) results in an output that includes 1.9 more blocks than initially calculated with ( w ). It's important to note that there was a correction suggested by the sender indicating that the correct formula should likely be ( \frac{2014}{2016} ), reversing the original fraction. This adjustment is crucial for accurate calculations and should be applied only in specific instances within the equation set, not universally across all uses of ( w ). This distinction ensures that the precision of computations is maintained according to the intended parameters of the system or model being used.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback