CTV+CSFS: Can we reach consensus on a first step towards covenants?
Posted by instagibbs
Mar 17, 2025/22:45 UTC
The discussion revolves around the selection of OP_NOP4 for Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 119 (BIP119) over other possible upgrade paths such as tapleaf version or OP_SUCCESS. The primary reason behind this choice appears to be timing, as BIP119 was conceptualized before the introduction of the taproot BIP. This chronology suggests that OP_NOP4 was chosen due to the constraints and understanding present at the time of its writing, rather than it being considered superior to alternatives that were later developed or proposed.
Understanding the context and rationale behind specific choices in the development of blockchain technologies, like Bitcoin, is crucial for both developers and enthusiasts. It sheds light on the iterative and sometimes contingent nature of technological advancement, where decisions are often made based on the current knowledge, resources, and consensus mechanisms available. In this case, the selection of OP_NOP4 illustrates how developers must navigate the complex landscape of technical possibilities, community consensus, and the evolving framework of the technology they are contributing to.
TLDR
Join Our Newsletter
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
Explore all Products
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback