CTV+CSFS: Can we reach consensus on a first step towards covenants?
Posted by instagibbs
Jun 6, 2025/20:41 UTC
The discussion revolves around the proposition of implementing a taproot-only push opcode and whether it necessitates the introduction of a new witness version specifically for bare tapscript. A detailed exploration of this topic is shared on a forum, with the conversation highlighting various perspectives on the potential adoption of both proposals. The forum post in question can be found at delvingbitcoin.org, where the idea is presented not just in isolation but as part of a broader dialogue on enhancing the functionality and efficiency of Bitcoin's scripting capabilities. This approach underlines the importance of considering each proposal's implications separately while acknowledging the possibility of their combined adoption to pave the way towards more sophisticated covenant mechanisms within the Bitcoin protocol. The conversation underscores the necessity of a nuanced understanding and careful consideration of such advancements, suggesting that they could significantly impact the development trajectory of Bitcoin's scripting and transaction capabilities.
TLDR
Join Our Newsletter
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
Explore all Products
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback