Posted by waxwing/ AdamISZ
Mar 17, 2026/18:30 UTC
In a recent communication regarding a proposal, an oversight was acknowledged by the sender who initially misunderstood the use of pubkey-prefixing being discussed. The clarification highlighted that the original discourse involved the application of hash-160 of P for pubkey-prefixing, which the sender admitted to having overlooked. This misunderstanding led to an unnecessary elaboration on the topic of pubkey-prefixing which, while potentially interesting to some, was misplaced in this context. This exchange took place within the Bitcoin Development Mailing List group, a forum dedicated to discussions surrounding Bitcoin's development.
Thread Summary (12 replies)
Mar 16 - Mar 16, 2026
13 messages • 12 replies
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback