Posted by Matt Corallo
Feb 26, 2025/19:02 UTC
The discussion centers on the challenges and considerations in making Bitcoin quantum-secure, highlighting the complexities involved in adopting post-quantum cryptography (PQC) techniques for Bitcoin. The consensus appears to be that transitioning Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant architecture is not immediately feasible, given the current state of PQC research and the significant time it would likely take to develop and implement a secure, lattice-based system within the Bitcoin framework. Lattice-based systems, although considered for enhancing security atop traditional schemes, are not seen as a direct replacement due to their unproven viability in this context.
In the interim, the focus shifts towards more practical, short-term solutions that could offer Bitcoin some level of resilience against quantum computing threats. One such proposal involves integrating hash-based schemes into Bitcoin’s existing taproot outputs. This approach is favored because hash-based security mechanisms are believed to retain their integrity over the next couple of decades, thereby providing a buffer against quantum vulnerabilities for wallets created today. However, this strategy also acknowledges the inevitability of difficult decisions down the line, especially concerning how to address potential quantum computing attacks on Bitcoin's supply.
The conversation further delves into the theoretical scenario of a quantum computer (QC) compromising a significant portion of Bitcoin's total supply. There's an acknowledgment of the dilemma surrounding whether to preemptively confiscate coins to mitigate such an attack. A suggested compromise involves creating version-2 segwit outputs, which would allow future soft forks to restrict keypath spending, offering a mechanism to freeze affected funds if necessary. This idea reflects a broader acknowledgment that definitive actions regarding quantum attacks cannot be predetermined and will heavily depend on the technological landscape and Bitcoin’s adoption of proposed security measures over time.
Ultimately, the discourse underscores the importance of preparing Bitcoin for potential quantum computing threats through adaptable, forward-thinking strategies. By embedding options within the Bitcoin protocol today, the community aims to preserve the ability to make informed, effective decisions in response to future quantum advancements, without committing to a specific course of action that may become obsolete as technology evolves.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback