PQC - What is our Goal, Even?

The recent discussions around cryptocurrency emphasize the concerns regarding the prioritization of safe coin maximization over decentralization and proof. This approach is viewed critically as it potentially undermines the very principles that form the bedrock of blockchain technology. The consensus seems to be that without demonstrable proof of ownership, typically verified through private keys, there's no reliable method to establish a person's claim over a coin. This becomes particularly problematic in scenarios involving advanced quantum computing, which could compromise private key security and blur the lines between legitimate coin holders and attackers.

Moreover, there's an ongoing debate about the application of Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP) in this context. It appears there is a general agreement that ZKPs cannot adequately address the threats posed by quantum computing to private keys. Instead, the focus should shift towards empowering users to actively protect their assets. This can be achieved by providing mechanisms that allow users to opt into security enhancements as and when they deem necessary. Such proactive measures are vital for maintaining the sovereignty and integrity of user holdings, reinforcing the core objective of decentralized protocols which prioritize user autonomy and peer-to-peer interaction.

In essence, sidelining the goals of decentralization and sovereignty could lead to undermining the foundational values analogous to overlooking freedom of speech in a democracy. Thus, maintaining these principles should remain a primary objective within the cryptographic and blockchain communities to ensure the technology fulfills its original intent.