Bitcoin TLDR

#110

newsletter icon

Summary

Dec 30 - Jan 2, 2026

Our weekly newsletter is focused on keeping you updated on what's new in Bitcoin, and summarizes the bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev and delving bitcoin mailing lists

The latest release of Bitcoin Core, version 30.1, introduces a host of new features, performance enhancements, and bug fixes, aimed at improving the overall user experience and system efficiency. Noteworthy improvements include wallet functionality updates, enhanced build processes for better integration with modern operating systems, and significant refinements in P2P connectivity and GUI modernization. The development and successful launch of this version were supported by the contributions of several individuals, including Ava Chow, Cory Fields, and Eugene Siegel, among others, emphasizing the collaborative nature of the project. For more information or to download the update, visit Bitcoin Core's official website.

A resurgence of debate around Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 54 has unfolded, centering on its implications for ASIC optimization and block height commitment strategies. Luke Dashjr's critique regarding the use of nLockTime in coinbase transactions for extranonce embedding, and Jeremy Rubin's concerns over potential smart contract complications due to transaction size restrictions, highlight the community's focus on balancing technical innovation with the ecosystem's stability. This ongoing dialogue reflects broader discussions within the Bitcoin community on maintaining a pragmatic approach to development, as evidenced in platforms like YouTube and DelvingBitcoin.org.

Meanwhile, discussions on the sustainability of open-source funding models in the Bitcoin ecosystem have been initiated by Nic, raising concerns about the fairness and viability of expecting unpaid preliminary work from contributors seeking grants. This conversation delves into the challenges of selection bias, potential time wastage, and the deterrent effect on robust proposal submission due to the lack of upfront compensation for initial exploratory efforts. Nic's inquiry into alternative funding structures seeks to foster a more equitable approach to early-stage intellectual contributions, highlighting a critical examination of current practices and the quest for improvements within the community's funding mechanisms.

Lastly, the potential and limitations of the Lightning Network in scaling Bitcoin payments have been scrutinized, with a focus on the structural challenges posed by liquidity distribution and the network's dependence on on-chain transactions for significant topology alterations. The proposal of Ark as a multi-party state update mechanism introduces a novel approach to liquidity management, suggesting a potential shift towards more dynamic channel graph restructuring. However, this innovation also brings new operational, trust, and privacy concerns, underscoring the complexity of enhancing scalability while maintaining the decentralized ethos of Bitcoin payments. The collaborative exploration of these issues, supported by contributions from the open-source community and ongoing research, exemplifies the collective effort towards evolving Bitcoin's payment scalability. Relevant discussions and research contributions can be explored further at DelvingBitcoin.org.

Active Discussions

Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion.

15 replies

By Antoine Riard

Involving Greg Maxwell, Jonathan Voss+8 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 11, 2025 20:54 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 24, 2025 17:19 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The email discusses the complexity of defining spam in Bitcoin and online forums.

  • It highlights the importance of including all perspectives in technical debates, avoiding censorship.

  • Personal experiences underline the necessity for openness in Bitcoin's development community.

BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format

3 replies

By waxwing/ AdamISZ

Involving Oren

calendar icon

Original post on December 28, 2025 14:21 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 28, 2025 14:21 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The discussion introduces a new Bitcoin Improvement Proposal idea focusing on "deadman's switch" systems.

  • It compares the proposal to current systems, emphasizing versatility and technical challenges, especially the testmempoolaccept RPC issue.

  • Solutions and critiques of technical specifics are explored, alongside concerns over implementation complexities and use case adaptability.

Understanding and Mitigating a OP_CTV Footgun: The Unsatisfiable UTXO

18 replies

By reardencode

Involving 1440000bytes, salvatoshi+8 others

calendar icon

Original post on July 3, 2025 20:09 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 30, 2025 19:06 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The CheckTemplateVerify covenant enhances Bitcoin's script for sophisticated constructions, not direct address use.

  • [BIP443](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/fc00f51c229088c447b3694cca9bf14ace0e1a96/bip-0443.mediawiki) signals a shift towards better integration with LNHANCE and THIKCS/FISHSTICK opcodes.

  • This strategic alignment aims to refine Bitcoin scripting, echoing @jamesob's CovTools soft fork enhancements.

OP_CC: A simple introspection opcode to enable cheaper consolidations

12 replies

By billymcbip

Involving reardencode, sipa+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on December 30, 2025 12:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 5, 2026 20:32 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • OP_CC is a key proposal to enhance blockchain's economic efficiency without bigger blocks.

  • Tadge Dryja's OP_CIV lacks space savings compared to OP_CC, limiting its utility.

  • OP_CC is favored for its ease of implementation and potential for broad adoption.

A quantum resistance script only using op_ctv/op_txhash and no new signatures

1 reply

By reardencode

Involving simul

calendar icon

Original post on December 18, 2025 23:27 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 9, 2026 04:06 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Predetermined transaction and expenditure amounts limit flexibility in cryptocurrency construction.

  • Quantum vulnerabilities exist due to reliance on secp256k1, making it non-quantum safe.

  • Adopting CCV could address these issues by allowing value flow enforcement and improving security.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback