Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion.

Dec 11 - Dec 12, 2025

  • In an ongoing debate among Bitcoin developers, the focus is on how to manage unspendable outputs within the Bitcoin Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) set efficiently.

Greg Maxwell's proposal aims to address the challenges posed by Bitcoin Stamps and Ordinal inscriptions without conflicting with Bitcoin's foundational principles. He suggests marking Bitcoin Stamp outputs as unspendable and removing them from the UTXO set, a move that aligns with maintaining the network's efficiency. For Ordinal inscriptions, which are associated with spendable satoshis but can contribute to spam, Maxwell proposes a nuanced approach. He recommends a transaction validation rule to limit the utility of these inscriptions without outright confiscation. The suggested rule would require transactions spending Ordinal inscription UTXOs to have fewer outputs than inputs, specifically targeting transactions where inputs are less than 1,000 satoshis. This proposal represents a strategic effort to mitigate potential issues arising from Ordinals while adhering to Bitcoin’s ethos.

Further discussion in the Bitcoin Development Mailing List clarifies that managing provably unspendable outputs, such as those exceeding storage parameters or beginning with OP_RETURN, does not necessitate a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP). It is considered an implementation detail aimed at optimizing blockchain efficiency and storage. This reflects a broader understanding within the community of balancing technical improvements with the core principles of Bitcoin.

An alternative perspective was introduced, suggesting that miners could influence the handling of Ordinal inscriptions by imposing a minimum fee requirement for transactions involving these UTXOs. This idea, however, raises concerns about differentiating between UTXOs at a consensus level, potentially threatening Bitcoin's integrity more than the spam it seeks to eliminate. The dialogue underscores the complexity of addressing spam within Bitcoin's ecosystem, emphasizing the need for solutions that do not compromise the network’s foundational ideals or operational robustness.

The conversation illuminates the diverse opinions and proposed solutions within the developer community regarding the management of unspendable outputs and spam mitigation. The emphasis remains on finding measures that maintain Bitcoin's efficiency and adhere to its guiding principles, highlighting the ongoing challenge of evolving the network while preserving its core values.

Link to Raw Post

Thread Summary (4 replies)

Dec 11 - Dec 12, 2025

Thread Overview

5 messages • 4 replies

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback