Miners prioritize the total block reward, which encompasses both the transaction fees and the block subsidy. An increase in block rate, allowing miners to claim more subsidies and potentially more fees, could lead to a reduction in fee rates. However, this does not necessarily imply a decrease in total fee revenues. The discussion touches on the implications of a 10% speed increase in block generation following a sustained 51% attack over 59 difficulty periods. While such a scenario might reduce the likelihood of attacks compared to current incentives, it's noted that the certainty of preventing attacks altogether is not assured due to the high concentration of mining power and the decreasing nature of miners' revenue from block subsidies.

Furthermore, the concept of a "miner activated fee rate easing" is introduced as a strategic move that might be employed post-attack, underlining that it wouldn't necessarily require reorganizing blocks by honest miners if a significant portion of the network's hash rate were involved. This strategy suggests a potential method for miners to increase revenue while offering lower fees to users, without directly marketing the approach as a 51% attack. This nuanced understanding of blockchain economics highlights the intricate balance between ensuring network security and optimizing miner incentives, pointing towards innovative but cautious approaches to managing blockchain dynamics.