Timewarp attack 600 second grace period

The first viewpoint mentions a preference for a more lenient limit of 2 weeks, as opposed to a more restrictive 2-hour timeframe, highlighting a general consensus that any duration above a single day is considered secure and acceptable, whereas anything below is deemed risky. This perspective suggests that longer durations provide a safer operational window. On the other hand, there's a mention of a debate over specific numerical limits—7200 versus 600—wherein it's noted that the higher figure could potentially lead to a slight increase in inflation, a point brought up by @TheBlueMatt. This argument implies concerns over the implications of these limits on system stability or value retention. The preference expressed by @murch for the 2-week limitation indicates a cautious approach towards risk management, aiming to ensure safety and reliability within the system's operations.