A suggestion for a BIP 3 indicates that there may be a need for revisions or a new proposal to address these ongoing issues. However, it's essential to differentiate between the systemic struggles related to BIPs and individual viewpoints that do not align with the established procedures. AJ's perspective seems to intertwine his personal disagreements with the traditional functioning of BIPs, which might not be directly related to the core issue at hand.

The discourse around BIPs highlights the intrinsic tension between the need for structured improvement processes and the decentralized, voluntary nature of Bitcoin's development community. This suggests an underlying complexity in managing and evolving a system that relies heavily on consensus and volunteer contributions. As such, any proposed changes or new initiatives like BIP 3 must consider how to effectively marshal and utilize volunteer efforts without detracting from the ethos of decentralization that underpins the Bitcoin network.