Posted by Peter Todd
Oct 26, 2023/22:11 UTC
The email discusses the use of mathematical functions like SHA256() or Pubkey() as an easy way to handle certain tasks. However, it questions the purpose of using numbers if these functions are not memorable. The email suggests that instead of relying on a centralized BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) system, people should be allowed to publish ideas on their own web pages and determine naming conventions on a case-by-case basis. The author argues that a functioning BIP system inherently involves human gatekeepers who apply standards to approve BIPs, making it centralized. The email concludes by providing a link to Peter Todd's website: https://petertodd.org.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback