Ordinals BIP PR

In a recent email, the sender raises important questions regarding Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) and their evaluation process. The email suggests that there should be an evaluation of BIPs even before they become proposals. However, this idea poses several challenging questions.

One of the questions raised is about who would be in charge of evaluating these proposals. It is unclear who would have the authority or responsibility to assess the potential impact and feasibility of BIPs. Additionally, there is uncertainty about how to predict whether a proposal will become a widespread standard within the Bitcoin community.

Another question pertains to the core mission of Bitcoin. The email asks what defines the central objective of Bitcoin and how to determine if a proposed improvement aligns with this mission. This raises issues related to defining and measuring the core values and goals of the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Furthermore, the email mentions the importance of understanding the entire Bitcoin community. It acknowledges the challenge of identifying and defining this community as a whole, which includes various stakeholders such as developers, miners, users, and other participants.

Overall, the email highlights the need for a thoughtful evaluation process for BIPs, considering factors such as authority, prediction of widespread adoption, alignment with the core mission of Bitcoin, and a comprehensive understanding of the Bitcoin community. These questions emphasize the complexities involved in improving the Bitcoin protocol and the importance of careful consideration when proposing changes.