Posted by evd0kim
Sep 5, 2026/20:01 UTC
The discussion about BitVM and its exclusion from current considerations arises from a technical perspective. It is acknowledged that it should technically be possible to integrate any system into groth16, utilizing already available technologies. This would theoretically allow for the leveraging of existing frameworks and solutions without needing to develop new foundational technologies. The query highlights an apparent oversight or decision against using BitVM in favor of other options, suggesting a need for clarification or reevaluation of the potential benefits BitVM could offer when wrapped with groth16.
Furthermore, LeanVM emerges as a noteworthy topic due to its recent introduction and connections to previously discontinued projects, specifically binius. As a new technology, LeanVM is positioned as a successor or continuation of ideas initially developed in binius, indicating a potential revival or reimplementation of concepts from the abandoned project. This transition points to a strategic shift or advancement in the technological approach being pursued, emphasizing the ongoing evolution within this field and the continuous search for more efficient or effective solutions.
Thread Summary (9 replies)
Sep 4 - Sep 16, 2026
10 messages
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback