CTV, APO, CAT activity on signet

Posted by vostrnad

Dec 16, 2024/13:03 UTC

The discussion revolves around the functionality of a website that is designed to detect spend transactions. This feature leads to an interpretation where an opcode's usage is only considered valid if it results in a spend. The underlying assumption here suggests that without a spend action, an opcode might not be deemed as "used" within the system's tracking mechanism. The conversation opens up an avenue for feedback or alternative suggestions regarding the choice of wording used to describe this functionality. Contributors and users of the website are encouraged to provide their input by submitting a pull request, indicating a collaborative approach towards refining and enhancing the site's descriptive accuracy and overall user experience. This method of community involvement not only allows for direct engagement but also ensures that the terminology and functionalities provided by the website accurately reflect the expectations and realities of its user base.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback