Great Consensus Cleanup Revival

Posted by garlonicon

Feb 27, 2025/14:16 UTC

When engaging in transactions between Segwit and Anchor addresses, or from one Anchor address to another, it's crucial to include a dummy OP_RETURN output. This requirement stems from the need to ensure transaction validity, addressing a specific scenario where omitting this would result in a 64-byte transaction that may not be processed as intended. The significance of this practice is highlighted by a specific transaction example, identifiable through its hash: f1572558fed009ab9d247da85be221e3d8f98c80b66ce9c2ada3a25cba0d797a. For more detailed examination of this transaction, interested parties can refer to its record on the testnet4 blockchain via mempool.space. This inclusion of an OP_RETURN output serves not only as a functional element to facilitate these types of transactions but also carries a message explaining its utility, thereby shedding light on a nuanced aspect of transaction construction within these specific contexts.

Link to Raw Post

Thread Summary (91 replies)

Mar 24 - Mar 19, 2026

Message History

92 messages

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

Weโ€™ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with ๐Ÿงก by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback