State of the transaction privacy work in Bitcoin

Posted by Kruw

Jun 23, 2026/11:11 UTC

The discussion revolves around the technical workings and challenges associated with silent payments in cryptocurrency transactions, specifically addressing the process of calculating destination addresses and the sharing of Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs). When using wallet software on local systems such as those operated by Alice or Charlie, the calculation of the recipient addresses for these transactions is performed locally. This local calculation necessitates that the custodian of the transaction first shares the UTXOs intended for use in the payment. This step is crucial because without access to the relevant UTXOs, the software cannot compute the final destination address where the funds should be sent.

However, this method introduces a complexity: consistently sharing and validating new addresses for each transaction can be burdensome and contradicts earlier claims suggesting that creating and managing multiple accounts or unlinkable static addresses is straightforward. The assertion that it is trivial to establish a second account or generate a new, unlinkable static address contrasts starkly with the practical difficulties highlighted in managing these addresses effectively in ongoing transaction processes. This discrepancy points to a significant challenge in the current understanding and implementation of silent payment mechanisms within digital currency frameworks.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback