Posted by moonsettler
Jan 25, 2025/22:40 UTC
In the process of evaluating a potential change within a codebase, it's been determined that altering the type as previously considered may not be a practical approach. This conclusion arises from the observation that such a modification introduces significant changes, undermining the simplicity and portability of the code. Despite the fact that the code compiles without errors, there's an implicit acknowledgment of underlying bugs that are not immediately apparent.
A suggestion has been made to improve readability and clarity in the code by renaming flags_t
to ScriptFlags
or a similarly descriptive identifier. This naming convention would likely enhance the understanding of the code's purpose and functionality for future developers.
For further inspection or contribution, the specific modifications discussed can be viewed directly through the provided GitHub commit link: GitHub Commit. This link leads to a detailed breakdown of the changes proposed, offering insights into the technical aspects debated and the rationale behind the decision-making process.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback