How CTV+CSFS improves BitVM bridges

Posted by JeremyRubin

Apr 28, 2025/15:47 UTC

A sighash group, as discussed, cannot straightforwardly address the issue at hand due to the requirement for an interactive setup for its construction. This necessity arises unless APO-semantics or an alternative solution is employed. The complexity of the situation is further highlighted by the fact that while one party (A) can commit to another (B), the reverse commitment from B to A is not facilitated, even when additional opcodes are considered. This delineates a significant limitation within the current framework, underscoring the need for a more nuanced approach or the incorporation of new semantics to effectively manage commitments between parties.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback