How CTV+CSFS improves BitVM bridges

Posted by RobinLinus

Apr 11, 2025/17:37 UTC

In discussing the technicalities of Bitcoin transactions, an important correction is necessary regarding the specific sighash flags used to presign a transaction. Initially, it was mentioned that the appropriate sighash flag combination for a particular transaction signing scenario is SINGLE|NONE. However, this was incorrect. The correct sighash flags to be used in this context are ANYONECANPAY|NONE. This adjustment is crucial for anyone working with Bitcoin transactions where selective signing is involved, as the sighash flag dictates how the transaction is signed by indicating which parts of the transaction are signed and which are not.

The use of ANYONECANPAY allows the signer to specify that they are only signing their own inputs, without regard to any other inputs that might be added to the transaction. This is particularly useful in scenarios where multiple parties are contributing inputs to a single transaction, but each party wants to ensure that their contribution is correctly signed without having to sign for the entire transaction. The NONE option signifies that no outputs are being signed for, giving further flexibility in constructing transactions that can later have outputs modified or added by others. This correction underscores the importance of understanding the nuanced functionalities provided by Bitcoin's sighash flags, enabling developers to create more flexible and secure transaction protocols.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback