Posted by Ava Chow
Mar 31, 2024/17:01 UTC
The discussion revolves around the progression of assigning Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) editors and the approach to BIP numbering in the absence of existing guidance. Matt Corallo expresses his agreement on moving forward with the proposed timeline and supports the nomination of Kanzure, Ruben, Roasbeef, Murch, and Jonatack as BIP editors, endowed with all privileges and responsibilities as outlined in BIP 2. The issue of assigning BIP numbers is highlighted, with a suggestion to adopt a new numbering scheme if no guidance is provided by Luke upon granting permissions to the new BIP editors. This suggestion stems from the concern over being hindered by the mere assignment of proposal numbers, indicating a readiness to streamline the process to avoid unnecessary bottlenecks.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback