Adding New BIP Editors
Posted by /dev /fd0
Feb 28, 2024/04:22 UTC
In the given correspondence, the sender expresses a preference for archiving the Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) repository and suggests that individuals maintain separate repositories for BIPs. Despite this preference, there's an acknowledgment of the continued relevance of a unified BIPs repository. A significant point of contention highlighted is the disagreement with having mailing list moderators also serve as BIP editors. The sender explicitly disagrees with two suggested names for these roles but does not provide alternative suggestions or elaborate on the reasons for this disagreement. This stance underscores a broader discussion about the governance and maintenance of critical resources in the Bitcoin development ecosystem, highlighting concerns over potential conflicts of interest or inefficiencies that might arise from overlapping responsibilities between different administrative roles.
TLDR
Join Our Newsletter
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
Explore all Products
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback