Posted by Christian Decker
Oct 22, 2015/08:26 UTC
The discussion is centered around the issue of single signer re-ordering the inputs and outputs of a transaction and re-signing it, which is considered to be in the same category as simple double-spends. Even if a canonical ordering is instated, there may not be much that can be done about it, as the signer could simply sign a completely different transaction spending the same coins elsewhere. Normalized transaction IDs can help prevent modification in multi-signer scenarios and immediate follow-up transactions by the same signer. However, Luke Dashjr argues that third-party manipulation is not much more of a problem than signing-party manipulation and that solving the former without solving the latter is not worth the high cost.
TLDR
We鈥檒l email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback