[BIP] Normalized transaction IDs

Posted by Luke Dashjr

Oct 21, 2015/07:52 UTC

The discussion revolves around the issue of malleability in Bitcoin transactions. While some believe that specifying flags upfront in the UTXO-creating transaction could allow for implementation of fully malleability-proof wallets, others argue that the use of non-sighash_all flags still poses a threat to the security of transactions. Signer malleability is also a concern needing consideration, and it is suggested that wallets should actively CoinJoin, bump fees on, etc any pending transactions in the background to prevent these forms of malleability. The discussion shows that malleability remains an important issue in Bitcoin transactions that needs continued attention.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We鈥檒l email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 馃А by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback