Consensus Cleanup BIP draft

Posted by Sjors Provoost

Mar 29, 2025/11:02 UTC

The discussion on the Bitcoin Development Mailing List highlighted a key aspect of Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) wallets, emphasizing their broad definition that encompasses any automated bridge necessitating knowledge of Bitcoin transaction inclusion. This distinction is crucial when considering the implementation challenges across different platforms. For example, what might be straightforward to execute in a Rust-based Bitcoin wallet could present significant hurdles in a smart contract environment. The dialogue suggests that an empirical demonstration, potentially through the development of a bridge leveraging proposed covenant opcodes, could effectively illustrate the varying degrees of complexity introduced by the 64-byte limit.

Moreover, the conversation underlines the importance of engaging with existing threads on this subject to form a well-rounded understanding. It's recommended that the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) should reference these discussions to aid readers in grasping the full breadth of perspectives and technical nuances involved. This approach not only fosters a more informed community but also supports a comprehensive evaluation of proposed changes within the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback