Consensus Cleanup BIP draft

The discourse surrounding the proposed Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) is marked by a thorough examination and collaboration over the past year, underscoring the proposer's confidence in moving forward with the suggested changes. This level of detailed scrutiny and debate, involving multiple experts, signifies the proposal's robustness and readiness for advancement. However, there seems to be a call for a shift towards a more adaptable mindset, especially at this juncture of the proposal's life cycle. The pre-BIP and BIP stages attract different levels of attention and critique, which is essential for refining and enhancing the proposal. Nevertheless, the current tone of discourse might deter valuable contributions from experts, potentially viewing the critique as dismissive rather than constructive.

A critical oversight has been highlighted in the proposal regarding the existence of 64-byte transactions on the blockchain, only brought to the proposer's attention recently. Additionally, the proposal includes a contentious hack involving the coinbase nSequence, raising concerns about its acceptance among miners and the potential unforeseen impact on mining hardware, specifically ASICs that may have hardcoded parameters not previously required to be adjustable. Moreover, there's a strong personal opposition to the removal of 64-byte transactions, described as a flaw in the transaction mechanism. This aspect is particularly problematic considering future upgrades focused on transaction programmability, which might clash with the elimination of such transactions, thereby complicating or hindering potential enhancements in this area.