Jun 8 - Jul 8, 2025
The conversation begins with an analysis of the fixed-sum Winternitz one-time signature scheme (WOTS), emphasizing the selection of specific parameters to ensure the integrity of digital transactions. The optimal checksum calculation for efficient signing, avoiding the use of random salt counters, and considerations for employing less collision-resistant hashing algorithms for efficiency gains are central themes. The dialogue also explores the feasibility of using a combination of RMD160 and SHA256 hashing functions to reduce witness size in transactions while maintaining adequate collision resistance.
Further technical exchanges propose improvements in Bitcoin script efficiency through strategic use of OP codes, leading to significant reductions in script sizes. A transformative suggestion involves substituting certain operations with OP_LSHIFT, achieving a reduction in byte usage and overall script and witness size. This optimization, detailed in a shared gist, highlights the collaborative and innovative efforts within the community to refine Bitcoin scripting capabilities.
The conversation extends to methods for reducing signature sizes and improving verification costs, juxtaposing different constructions and their implications for blockchain applications. A focus on preimage resistance over collision resistance, informed by quantum computing considerations, underpins discussions about the potential of various Winternitz variants. The standardization of W-OTS+ as part of XMSS and its secure variants is mentioned as a critical point of reference.
Technical suggestions for optimizing conversion processes from four-bit pair to eight-bit format are introduced, alongside a brief mention of operational issues affecting transaction processing due to server downtime. This encapsulates a broader discussion on the necessity for smaller, quantum-resistant signature schemes to maintain network efficiency without increasing block size. Lattice-based cryptography emerges as a promising avenue for quantum resistance, with current hash-based alternatives considered temporary solutions pending the discovery of more efficient signature schemes.
Jeremy Rubin's work on enabling Lamport signatures through OP_CAT, leading to discussions around Winternitz One Time Signatures (WOTS) as a more compact alternative, signifies an ongoing exploration of post-quantum cryptographic solutions. The development and testing of prototype implementations, along with suggestions for further optimization, reflect the community's proactive approach to addressing the challenges posed by quantum computing. The sharing of resources and collaborative problem-solving efforts underscore the commitment to advancing cryptographic techniques within the Bitcoin development ecosystem.
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?
Give Feedback