OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures

Posted by conduition

Jul 8, 2025/00:49 UTC

The email from conduition to Jonas delves into the specifics of implementing a fixed-sum Winternitz one-time signature scheme, focusing on the efficiency and security aspects necessary for digital transaction signatures within the context of Bitcoin development. The discussion starts with an explanation of the chosen parameter w = 16 for the Winternitz scheme, highlighting how the optimal checksum value for efficient signing is calculated based on the bit-length of the message to be signed. This calculation is crucial for ensuring the integrity and non-repudiation of digital transactions, as it directly influences the security and performance of the signature mechanism.

Further, conduition clarifies that, unlike traditional implementations of the Winternitz one-time signature (WOTS), their approach does not incorporate a random salt counter appended to the signature. This deviation from the norm is justified by the nature of the application; since the signature process involves signing an elliptic curve (EC) signature which then signs the transaction hash, there's flexibility to regenerate the EC signature with new nonce values until achieving a hash that meets a predefined checksum requirement. This method effectively bypasses the need for additional randomness provided by a salt, streamlining the signing process without compromising security.

The email also touches upon the comparative analysis between the standard WOTS and its enhanced version, WOTS+. The conversation suggests that the primary motivation to prefer WOTS+ over the basic version would be the use of a less collision-resistant hashing algorithm, potentially for efficiency gains. However, conduition raises an inquiry regarding the feasibility of employing OP_HASH160, a concatenation of RMD160 and SHA256 hashing functions, as an alternative to further reduce the witness size in transactions while maintaining adequate collision resistance.

This technical exchange reflects an ongoing exploration of optimization strategies for digital signature schemes in blockchain technologies. By analyzing different parameters, hashing algorithms, and implementation details, the contributors aim to enhance the efficiency, security, and practicality of cryptographic operations within Bitcoin's evolving infrastructure.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback