Schnorr signatures BIP

Posted by Erik Aronesty

Aug 29, 2018/12:09 UTC

The proposed BIP for 64-byte elliptic curve Schnorr signatures is simply a draft specification of the signature scheme itself. It does not concern consensus rules, aggregation, or any other integration into Bitcoin - those things are left for other proposals, which can refer to this scheme if desirable. Standardizing the signature scheme is a first step towards that, and as it may be useful in other contexts to have a common Schnorr scheme available, it is its own informational BIP. The encoding of public (and private) keys is unspecified. The R(share) can still be used "online", if share participants publish the R(share), but offline multiparty signing is eliminated in exchange for batch validation. Andrew Poelstra suggests that they should specify that they use the standard encoding from section 2.3 except that they allow only compressed public keys.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback