lightning-dev

Anchor transaction for no expiration channels without segwit

Anchor transaction for no expiration channels without segwit

Original Postby Nicolas Dorier

Posted on: February 6, 2017 16:32 UTC

According to the given context, it seems that someone is suggesting that there is no need for a second timeout.

The reason behind this statement is that TX2 can only be signed by Bob once he receives the second output of TX1. Therefore, Bob does not have to worry about Alice closing the channel with TX2. The message seems to be addressed to someone named Nicolas, but there is no further information available regarding their identity or involvement in the discussion.It is unclear what the specific context of the conversation is or what the implications of this statement may be. However, it appears to be related to some sort of transaction or agreement between multiple parties. The use of technical terminology such as "TX1" and "TX2" suggests that this may be a discussion related to cryptocurrency or blockchain technology.Without more information, it is difficult to fully understand the significance of this statement or its potential impact on the situation at hand. It is possible that further clarification or context would be necessary to fully comprehend the meaning behind this message.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback