This approach contrasts with the traditional method of static padding. The inquiry underscores a concern for making the data manipulation process more flexible and efficient, yet it is met with some resistance. The resistance stems from the considerable effort and time invested in developing the current system, which raises questions about the willingness to adapt or reconsider the established methodologies.

Despite the expressed discontent towards disagreement, it's essential to recognize that such discussions are critical for innovation and improvement, especially in the context of technological development. The mention of LNHANCE suggests that there are established protocols or expectations in place, possibly relating to how changes or suggestions are evaluated and implemented within the project or organization. The distinction made by the individual not considering themselves a "core developer" highlights a perceived hierarchical structure or division of roles that might influence the reception and consideration of new ideas.

This scenario illustrates the ongoing challenge within collaborative projects of balancing between sticking to tried and tested methods and being open to innovative approaches that could potentially offer better solutions. It also reflects on the dynamics of team interactions and the importance of fostering an environment where constructive criticism and suggestions are valued, irrespective of the source's official standing within the project hierarchy.