This consideration emerges from a reevaluation of previously discussed arguments within the thread, highlighting various perspectives on the matter. Initially, the benefits such as caching improvements and bandwidth reduction were highlighted to support this change. However, further scrutiny, particularly from Eric's insights, revealed that some of these anticipated advantages, like caching efficiency, might have been overestimated, and the overall impact on bandwidth reduction could be considered modest.

Despite these revelations, the argument tilts favorably towards implementing the change, mainly due to the positive implications it holds for Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) applications. The simplification that would result from excluding 64 bytes transactions is seen as a significant step forward in reducing complexity for these applications. This reduction in complexity is not just about making the system more efficient but also about enhancing the user experience by streamlining operations and potentially increasing the reliability of SPV applications.

In essence, while the initial reasons for the proposed change were challenged and found to be less impactful than first thought, the overarching benefit for SPV applications presents a compelling case for proceeding with making 64 bytes transactions invalid as part of the consensus cleanup efforts. This move is expected to contribute positively to the ecosystem by focusing on practical improvements that aid in application development and user interaction with the technology.