The primary argument presented critiques the fragility of Bitcoin, suggesting that its value could be undermined by shifts in societal values or demands, rendering it ineffective as a stable currency. Furthermore, the conversation delves into the specifics of transaction fees associated with Bitcoin, particularly focusing on the costs tied to operating within the Lightning Network. This aspect is highlighted as a significant barrier to entry for a majority of the global population, underscoring the point that high transaction fees can effectively exclude individuals from participating in the Bitcoin network. This exclusion is not dependent on the type of currency individuals possess, but rather on the inherent cost structures of the network, which are deemed unaffordable for most people worldwide.

The critique extends beyond the technicalities of transaction fees, touching on broader themes of equity and access within the digital currency space. It challenges the notion that Bitcoin, as currently structured, offers a universally accessible financial system. Instead, it points to systemic issues that could prevent widespread adoption, especially among those who are less financially privileged. The debate implicitly questions the ideals versus the practical realities of Bitcoin's promise to provide a decentralized and inclusive financial platform, highlighting discrepancies between the theoretical benefits and the operational constraints that may limit its utility for a significant portion of the global population.