Initially, the operation hinges on adjusting timestamps to extend the first difficulty period, effectively reducing the mining difficulty for the attacker. With strategic timestamp adjustments and halved hashrate, the attacker is able to extend the second difficulty period as well, maintaining a lowered difficulty level.

Further into the strategy, minimal timestamp increases are utilized to mine through a third difficulty period, culminating in a final timestamp that significantly exceeds the start of the attack, yet with an elapsed time that reveals the efficiency of the method in terms of block production versus time spent. This results in a substantial increase in difficulty at the conclusion of the operation, due to the discrepancy between the number of blocks produced and the actual time elapsed, reflecting a calculated manipulation aimed at maximizing block output while circumventing the typical difficulty scaling intended to stabilize block production rates.

The technical breakdown of this attack showcases the potential vulnerabilities within blockchain difficulty adjustment algorithms, especially when faced with coordinated efforts to exploit temporal parameters for gain. The detailed analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding and possibly reevaluating the resilience of current difficulty adjustment methodologies against such sophisticated forms of manipulation.