The proposed alterations include the elimination of the comments system, which is intended to streamline discussions and make the process more efficient. It also suggests a reworking of the workflow to better accommodate the needs and feedback of those involved in the BIP process.

A notable modification is the reduction of Status values from nine to four: Preliminary, Ready, Active, and Abandoned. This change not only simplifies the status system but also clarifies the meaning of each status to avoid confusion. Furthermore, the proposal seeks to replace the "Standards Track" BIP type with a "Specification" BIP type, alongside updating definitions for all BIP types to ensure clarity and relevance to current practices.

Another key aspect of the proposal is the declaration that Process BIPs will be considered living documents. This represents a shift towards a more flexible and adaptable approach, allowing for ongoing updates and revisions as needed. The discouragement of adoption tracking within the BIPs repository is also highlighted, aiming to focus efforts and attention on the development and refinement of BIPs themselves.

To improve transparency and record-keeping, the introduction of a Revision header and Change Log is suggested. These additions are designed to meticulously document changes to BIPs post-adoption recommendation, ensuring a clear history of amendments and updates. Moreover, the proposal outlines an update to the description of the repository’s scope to better align with its intended purpose and functionality.

Lastly, the draft proposes a reduction in the role of BIP Editors to merely checking editorial and formal criteria, thereby transferring judgment calls to the authors and audience. This adjustment is intended to decentralize decision-making and empower contributors and stakeholders.

Murch, the author of the proposal, expresses openness to reconsidering aspects of this draft based on constructive feedback and viable alternatives, especially urging readers to consider the rationale provided in the footnotes when suggesting changes. The draft can be found at this GitHub link, with plans to possibly introduce it to the main BIPs repository contingent on positive reception.