channel rebalancing support kind of exists already?

Posted by Corné Plooy

Feb 7, 2018/10:00 UTC

The Lightning protocol allows for better possibilities in channel rebalancing compared to Amiko Pay. In Lightning, the source can explicitly specify the entire route and even make money by rebalancing other people's channels if any channels offer negative fee rates to have them rebalanced. Channel rebalancing may be useful to reduce risk that some channels on the 'others' path might be saturated at inconvenient moments. For example, if Bob receives monthly salary from Alice and regularly wants to buy things from Carol, he would probably want to transfer his funds from the A-B channel as soon as possible to the B-C channel. Another use case could be privacy protection where Bob-Carol could be a pseudonymous contact on the TOR network. Regarding the scenario of balancing channels, Bob can balance his channels by paying himself an invoice of 1BTC and making sure the route goes out through Alice and comes back via Carol. Bob pays fees so he isn't ashamed if it disturbs the other balances in the network. However, there is a risk that the entire network will start doing this and it will start oscillating.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback