The Spam problem of Bitcoin and Unpermissioned Broadcast Networks in general

Posted by moonsettler

Oct 20, 2025/12:05 UTC

The discussion emphasizes the misplacement of a particular original post (OP), suggesting it was incorrectly categorized in the economics section. It implies that the content of the OP does not align with economic issues or discussions. The statement also indirectly addresses the audience's understanding of the topic at hand, hinting that a correct comprehension of the economic problem presented in the OP is crucial. This could suggest that the content of the OP requires specialized knowledge or insight into a specific area, possibly outside the realm of economics. By advising those who do not understand the economic problem to refrain from participating, the message underscores the importance of relevant expertise or familiarity with the subject matter being discussed. This guidance aims to filter contributions to the discussion, ensuring that input is both informed and pertinent to the true nature of the OP's content.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiDecoding BitcoinWarnet
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.

Give Feedback