Posted by AntoineP
Oct 15, 2024/08:57 UTC
Exploring the intricacies of Bitcoin's scripting mechanisms, a critical understanding emerges around the use of OP_CODESEPARATOR in relation to Segregated Witness (SegWit) transactions. The discussion highlights that a signature does not necessarily need to commit to the scriptCode. This is particularly significant because by leveraging OP_CODESEPARATOR, a user can extract the signature from the scriptCode. This method effectively circumvents potential vulnerabilities associated with the FindAndDelete function, primarily because once the signature is separated using OP_CODESEPARATOR, it becomes immune to the FindAndDelete discrepancy as there is no signature within the scriptCode for it to locate and manipulate. This aspect of Bitcoin's scripting language underscores a nuanced layer of security provided against certain types of exploits through its design, ensuring robustness in transaction integrity.
Thread Summary (11 replies)
Oct 10 - Sep 3, 2025
12 messages
TLDR
We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from high signal bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this project.
Give Feedback