Withdrawing OP_VAULT (BIP-345)

Posted by sjors

May 14, 2025/09:44 UTC

The discussion revolves around the latest perspectives on the potential malevolent uses, referred to as MEvil, of OP_VAULT in blockchain technology. The absence of MEvil potential in OP_VAULT is highlighted as a potential advantage, presenting it as an appealing feature for developers looking to implement application-specific opcodes. This aspect emphasizes the importance of ensuring security and trustworthiness in blockchain applications, where the introduction of new opcodes can significantly impact the ecosystem's overall safety and reliability.

Furthermore, the conversation touches upon the effectiveness of vaults created using Conditional Check Verifiability (CCV). It suggests that these vaults are sufficiently robust for current needs, implying that the introduction of a dedicated opcode for vaults may not be necessary at this juncture. This viewpoint underlines the need for a careful evaluation of the features and capabilities provided by existing solutions before introducing new elements into the blockchain development environment. The focus here is on optimizing the use of available resources and technologies to achieve desired outcomes without unnecessarily complicating the system with additional components.

Link to Raw Post
Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback